Attorneys for Janel Grant filed the following 10 page motion today before the United Stattes District Court of Connecticut:
Plaintiff Janel Grant (“Janel”) respectfully requests that the Court exercise its inherent power to strike the inflammatory lies made in Defendant Vincent K. McMahon’s (“McMahon”) memorandum of law in support of his motion to compel arbitration, filed April 23, 2024, ECF No. 30-1 (the “Motion”).1 Instead of using his Motion in the appropriate manner—to raise legal arguments concerning whether this dispute must be submitted to arbitration—McMahon instead uses the Motion’s “Preliminary Statement” as a platform to launch vicious falsehoods attacking Janel’s moral character in a transparent attempt to harass and intimidate her into submission.
McMahon’s easily refuted lies have no place in this case. It was not necessary, reasonable, or responsible to use a public filing to impugn Janel’s moral character. Indeed, McMahon’s desperate attempt to distract from the legal substance of the Motion highlight its weakness and the weakness of his overall case. 1 For the avoidance of doubt, Plaintiff's instant motion to strike is not a response on the merits to the arguments set forth in the Motion. Plaintiff will submit a response to the Motion in due course.
This Court has inherent power to strike a parties’ filings. Accordingly, Janel respectfully requests that the Court exercise that power to strike the Motion’s “Preliminary Statement” in its entirety and admonish McMahon and his counsel that such statements have no place in civil litigation.
INTRODUCTION
Even for Vince McMahon, the baseless, irrelevant, and false statements in the Motion’s “Preliminary Statement”—designed solely to harass and intimidate his longtime victim, Janel Grant—are a new low. For instance, McMahon’s unsupported assertions that Janel was “absent in her” dying parents’ lives and engaged to a wealthy attorney when she met McMahon are not only falsehoods conceived by McMahon to intimidate Janel into submission—as he has done countless times before—but have nothing to do with the legal arguments raised by the Motion.
McMahon’s lies are easily disproven. In truth, while Janel’s father was in in-home hospice care during his final days, Janel continued to provide him with around-the-clock care. At the same time, Janel had also cared for her blind, wheelchair-bound mother until her death. Moreover, Janel was not dating, let alone engaged to, her ex-fiancé in 2019. To the contrary, Janel’s ex-fiancé generously allowed Janel to stay in his apartment as she rebuilt her life following her parents’ passing. During this time, Janel had no job or other financial support aside from the friendship and generosity of her ex. Consistent with his past behavior, McMahon twists these truths to fit his own fictional narrative, much like the fantasy world of professional wrestling from where he came.
Yet even if McMahon’s falsities concerning Janel’s private life were true (they are not), these statements have no bearing on the merits of Janel’s claims, let alone the Motion. McMahon’s statements have no place in the Motion, which should be concerned solely with whether this dispute must be submitted to arbitration. It was not necessary, reasonable, or responsible to use a public filing to impugn Janel’s moral character. Indeed, McMahon’s desperate attempt to distract from the legal substance of the Motion highlight its weakness and the weakness of his overall case.
This Court has inherent power to strike a party’s filings. The Court should use that power to strike the Motion’s “Preliminary Statement” in its entirety and admonish McMahon and his counsel that such statements have no place in civil litigation.
BACKGROUND
Janel is a former employee of World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. n/k/a/ World Wrestling Entertainment, LLC (“WWE”) who was a victim of physical and emotion abuse, sexual assault and trafficking at WWE spanning several years. In Spring 2019, following the passing of her parents, Janel first met McMahon—the Founder and then-Executive Chairman of WWE—who promised her gainful employment with WWE. Over the next several years, however, Janel experienced unspeakable sexual and physical abuse at the hands of McMahon and other WWE employees directed by him. The horrors Janel endured have inflicted permanent trauma. On January 25, 2024, Janel filed her complaint in this action, seeking justice for the wrongs she suffered directly at McMahon’s hands.
On April 23, 2024, McMahon filed the Motion, seeking to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), The Motion’s “Preliminary Statement,” however, spends little time addressing facts or law relevant to the arbitrability of this dispute. Instead, the Preliminary Statement raises a series of wild accusations attacking Janel’s moral character. While the Preliminary Statement is riddled with irrelevant personal attacks 1 The entire “Preliminary Statement” is rife with irrelevant lies about Janel and, thus, is properly stricken. At minimum, however, the Court should strike the specific statements concerning her relationship with her parents and her ex-fiancé on pages 2-3 of the Motion against Janel, most egregiously, the Motion baselessly and shamelessly accuses Janel of fabricating her involvement in her dying parents’ care and cheating on her supposed fiancé.
None of these statements are relevant in any way to the arguments made in the Motion because that is not their purpose. These statements were made solely to harass, embarrass, and intimidate Janel into abandoning her claims against McMahon.
Grant's attorneys are requesting the court 'strike the “Preliminary Statement” of the Motion, or such portions thereof as the Court deems proper, and admonish McMahon and his counsel in a manner the Court deems appropriate."
If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!