PWInsider - WWE News, Wrestling News, WWE

THE AEW DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE SHOULD BE CONSISTENT, BEST WRESTLEMANIA, IMPACT WRESTLING HAS BEEN GOOD FOR A WHILE NOW

You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q and A at pwinsider@gmail.com.

Do you agree that either WM3 or WM39 is the greatest wrestling event of all time, or do you have another selection?

I don’t rate things as best or worst.  I can say that for me there’s now world where WM3 is anywhere close to my favorite Mania though.  Savage and Steamboat stole the show.  The rest was very Vincy.

In light of of the recent debacle, I would like to get your reaction to something. On a year old podcast, Eric Bischoff said that Tony Kahn isn't doing the right things to grow his business. Conrad Thompson responded by saying that Tony Kahn is happy with things the way that they are. That strikes me as a good way of explaining why things are as they are; Tony Kahn is living out his dream of going from his E-federation to booking wrestlers instead of action figures and doesn't particularly care about making a profit or running a business. Kind of like Dixie Carter with a richer father.

I can tell you aren’t an Elite subscriber because I have been saying for years now that Tony isn’t doing the right things to grow the business and that he is just happy to spend his money and be a booker/promoter.  So what Eric and Conrad said a year ago is what I have been saying for years now.  I don’t doubt that they have been saying it for that long as well because anyone who understands how business works can see Tony is doing things that work against AEW’s growth.

I watched impact for the first time in a very very very long time and it was good? Did I just catch a good episode or is it actually a hidden gem over there?

Impact has been a good product for a while now.  It’s a shame that they aren’t on a bigger network because if they were, they would gain more traction.

Does Tony Khan get the title of being the World’s Softest Billionaire or does that belong to Elon Musk?

If I had to rate them, of the two I would have to go with Tony but I can't say he's the softest overall because I don't know all of the billionaires.  But, until Musk publicly says he was scared for his life when someone tried to punch him, Khan has the edge on this one.  As I have said a few times now, I understand that no one wants to be punched.  I understand he actually may have been scared and that's fine.  However, there is no way that I think he should have said what he did on national TV, especially when all he had to say was, "Phil Brooks was fired with cause because he tried to assault and officer in the company".  No one sane would have had an issue with Khan saying that and firing Punk.  Instead.......

I saw a question come across about who the AEW Discipline Committee and you answered Larry, Curly and Moe. Not to be a stickler, but I believe you spelled the names wrong: Nick, Matt, Adam. 

Pop.  Seriously, there really is a committee.  Who is on it I can't say for sure.  It's just hilarious that when Punk actually hit an officer in the company backstage, the Committee didn't decide to fire him.  But when he allegedly took a swipe at Tony Khan?  That was grounds for termination.  Shouldn’t anyone taking a swing at anyone else be the grounds for termination under that example?

You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q and A at pwinsider@gmail.com.

If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!

• Tweet