Want more wrestling news, rumors, and results? Be sure to visit PWInsider.com and PWInsiderXtra.com.
You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q and A by clicking here.
Is it true that a recent campaign by WWE fans has convinced Robert Zemeckis to produce a Back to the Future IV. In which we see Marty and Doc travel back to 1985 to save Vince McMahon. From where he's been stuck ever since.
As I write this on Sunday afternoon I have to tell you, it made me laugh. If I read it again after Hell In A Cell I may have a much different opinion, and I don’t need to go into the future to think that could be the case.
With the "revolution" in women's wrestling not really getting into 2nd gear on the main shows, it got me thinking. In your opinion: How much of the blame really deserves to go on the Bellas and how good (or bad) are both really? I have a hard time seeing the true problem being them when to me, it's obvious that creative cuts the ladies in general short, at least outside of NXT. Admittedly as well, Nikki had a strong showing against Charlotte in their ppv encounter, with her actually being the one carrying the match and dictating the pace, while Brie looked good in what was, to be fair, more of a spectacle match with Stephanie McMahon. Both sisters had to work on their skills outside of NXT, before HHH was able to put more emphasis on women's wrestling, so the question remains: How good are they really, today?
I think that Nikki and Brie are average to solid, talent-wise. I think they both work hard when they go out there, but they just aren’t in the class of Sasha or Charlotte. With that said, it would be an issue if Nikki hadn’t been booked as being superior to Charlotte leading up to HIAC. Had they booked Charlotte to come out and beat Nikki convincingly, it would have made Charlotte look stronger. So, as is the case most of the time, I blame the booking.
What is your opinion about some of the WWE's PPV event titles (Money in the Bank, Hell in A Cell, Elimination Chamber) being used based around match types even though the match type isn't used in every matchup on the particular card? Would you prefer different PPV titles and just use those match types for special occasions/situations?
In the case of MITB and the Elimination Chamber (back when it was in February) I did not have an issue as the specific match type was part of making the stipulation. HIAC on the other hand should not be a regular PPV. I still remember Undertaker and CM Punk facing off for the first time in the cell. It makes no sense. The cell should be used to end feuds and sometimes, that just doesn’t happen in October, and creative can’t be trusted to book so that feuds do culminate then.
Do you believe the WWE should book Sasha Banks vs. Charlotte as the next big women's rivalry on the main roster?
Well, if they want to show how great women wrestlers can be, hell yes! If they let them do in WWE what they did in NXT, people would get really into the women.
Your thoughts on Tyler Breeze being called up to the main roster?
I love him and think he is a really good worker. My fear is Vince McMahon will see him, think he is too small and not push him. A lot of NXT guys have gotten less than great treatment on the main roster. But with that said, I am glad that he is getting a chance. He has earned it.
You can send us questions for the PWInsider.com Q&A by clicking here.
If you enjoy PWInsider.com you can check out the AD-FREE PWInsider Elite section, which features exclusive audio updates, news, our critically acclaimed podcasts, interviews and more by clicking here!
Bang On Casino
